Secretary of Education Linda McMahon adjusts her microphone before the start of a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing.

New Reforms End Uncapped Loan Borrowing for Certain Graduate and Professional Degrees

Share:

For nearly two decades, graduate and professional students in the United States had access to open-ended federal borrowing. Through the Direct Graduate PLUS loan program, eligible students could borrow up to the full cost of attending their school. These loans could include tuition, required fees, and living expenses.

That system has now come to an end. New federal reforms, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and new rules from the U.S. Department of Education, have eliminated Grad PLUS loans for new borrowers. In their place are strict annual and lifetime borrowing limits.

The new system also creates two borrowing tiers based on the type of degree a student is pursuing. This change is expected to affect universities, graduate students, and the private student loan market.

The Core Policy Shift: Caps, Tiers, and the PLUS Phase-Out

The biggest change is the phase-out of Direct PLUS loans for new graduate and professional students.

Students who were already enrolled before the applicable deadlines can remain under the previous rules. These students are effectively grandfathered into the old system. New students, however, face fixed federal borrowing limits.

The Department of Education replaced the open-ended PLUS system with two tiers for Direct Unsubsidized loans:

  • Standard Graduate Degrees
    • Annual borrowing limit: $20,500
    • Total borrowing limit: $100,000
  • Approved Professional Degrees
    • Annual borrowing limit: $50,000
    • Total borrowing limit: $200,000
  • Lifetime limit for undergraduate and graduate borrowing combined
    • $257,500

Loan eligibility is also now prorated for students attending school part-time or half-time. That means that a student who takes half of a full-time course load can no longer receive the full annual unsubsidized loan amount. This closes a long-standing gap in how federal funding was allocated.

Degree Tiering: Approved Professions vs. Contested Exclusions

One of the most controversial parts of the OBBBA changes is the Department of Education’s narrow definition of a “Professional Degree.”

Students in approved professional programs can qualify for the higher $50,000 annual borrowing limit. But the definition covers only certain fields. The Department’s final rule designated 11 traditional clinical and legal fields for the higher borrowing limit:

  • Medicine and Osteopathy: M.D., D.O.
  • Dental Health: D.D.S., D.M.D.
  • Legal Studies: Juris Doctor (J.D.)
  • Pharmacy and Veterinary Care: Pharm.D., D.V.M.
  • Vision and Podiatric Care: O.D., D.P.M., D.C.
  • Psychology and Divinity: Clinical Psychology (Ph.D./Psy.D.), M.Div.

The Exclusion of Essential Healthcare Fields

Several advanced healthcare and human service programs were placed in the lower Standard Graduate category.

That means students in these programs face the $20,500 annual limit and $100,000 lifetime limit.

Excluded degrees include:

  • Advanced Practice Nursing: Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA)
  • Allied Health Professions: Physician Assistant (PA), Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), and Occupational Therapy (OTD)
  • Behavioral Sciences: Master of Social Work (MSW) and Master of Public Health (MPH)

Graduate training for nurse anesthetists, physician assistants, and physical therapists can cost between $35,000 and $60,000 or more per year in tuition alone. As a result, students in these programs could face annual funding gaps of more than $15,000 to $30,000.

Major advocacy groups, including the American Hospital Association (AHA) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), warned that restricting financial aid could make existing shortages in primary care and nursing worse.

Higher education institutions and healthcare groups then challenged the rules in court. According to the Washington Post, federal courts granted preliminary injunctions against the narrow definition. While this particular portion (what is on each list) is being argued, the broader changes and loan caps are being actively implemented. The Department of Education responded by issuing temporary interim exceptions for several clinical health fields.

Permanent rulemaking and possible legislative changes remain under consideration in Congress. However, it’s not expected that anything will be passed since the House is in recess until the midterm elections. When they do come back, the “lame-duck” session until new members are admitted in January is usually uneventful.

Gainful Employment and Accountability Metrics

The administration also expanded accountability rules alongside the new borrowing limits.

These changes include new Earnings-to-Debt ratios and Gainful Employment rules. Under these rules, federal financial aid eligibility for graduate and professional programs is tied to the financial results of their graduates.

Programs whose graduates take on too much debt compared with their average anticipated earnings can face warnings. In some cases, they can eventually lose access to federal financial aid.

The goals of these two changes are:

  1. Reduce taxpayer exposure: Limiting federal loan defaults and future obligations from income-driven loan forgiveness.
  2. Put pressure on tuition prices: Encouraging universities to reduce high tuition costs instead of depending on federal loans to cover rising prices.

Real-World Impact: Students, Universities, and the Private Market

The end of uncapped graduate loans creates several major changes across the higher education landscape.

1. More Reliance on Private Loans

Students in expensive master’s programs or excluded healthcare programs may no longer be able to cover their full costs with federal loans. Many will need to turn to private lenders to make up the difference.

Private loans do not offer many of the protections that come with federal loans. These can include income-based repayment plans, Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), and certain deferment options. Private lenders may also require a credit check or a creditworthy co-signer.

2. Changes for Universities

Universities with expensive master’s programs could see enrollment declines as students consider the full cost of their education.

Schools may respond by:

  • Restructuring tuition prices
  • Offering more institutional financial aid
  • Changing program structures
  • Eliminating degree programs with low enrollment or financial returns

3. Greater Barriers to Access

The changes could also create new barriers for low-income and first-generation graduate students. Students without strong credit or a creditworthy co-signer may have a harder time covering the cost of an advanced degree.

That could make it more difficult for some students to enter expensive professional fields and could affect diversity within those professions.

The End of Open-Ended Federal Graduate Borrowing

The new loan limits mark a major change in how graduate education is financed in the U.S.

Students who previously could use Grad PLUS loans to cover the full cost of attendance will now face fixed federal borrowing limits. Students in programs with higher costs may need to find other sources of funding. Those options can include scholarships, school-based aid, personal savings, or private loans.

At the same time, universities face pressure to reconsider tuition prices and program costs. Legal challenges over degree classifications are still continuing in federal court. Temporary exceptions and possible legislative changes could also alter how some programs are treated.

For now, however, the federal student loan system has moved away from open-ended borrowing for new graduate and professional students.